Tottenham correct to keep Modric or would he have been better off at Chelsea?
Luka Modric
Everyone doubted daniel levy for keeping him would he have been better off with 50 million
 | |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Add comment and join the best football forum online!
Rate Luka Modric
116 ratings
Involved in this discussion
2
1
Latest Discussions
Latest Polls 
isn't*
posted 1 year ago / added by slufsar (elite) / reply
He has great technique, but he doesn't offer a lot to the Spurs side. No goals, no assists and he is close to controlling games with his passing.
posted 1 year ago / added by slufsar (elite) / reply
Poor Modric - he is a pawn in English football. All we can hope for is that will be let go in January. If Abramovich can afford Torres why not take Modric too. All he is doing is lining the pockets of other English clubs.
posted 1 year ago / added by Hybridism (elite) / reply